User:Old Dickens: Difference between revisions
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Bridge== | ==Bridge== | ||
''' | ''Terry Pratchett and Charles Dodgson'' | ||
'''I''''ve been fascinated for years by The Author's stated dislike of ''Alice in Wonderland''. As a new reader myself, all those generations ago, I was very fond of it (despite being a male child), along with ''Treasure Island'' and ''Tom Sawyer''. These are the books I recall as demonstrating the joy of reading to the formative mind. Here we are, decades later, author and dedicated fan in major disagreement. | |||
The kicker is that the two writers employ similar devices, lampooning the humdrum real world from a fantastic remote location. Mr Pratchett, in the usual quote (see [[Howandaland#Annotation|Howandaland]]), descends to a rather Republican level of pooh-pooh name-calling without a very convincing argument: it just rubs him the wrong way. I wonder why. | |||
==Chorus== | ==Chorus== | ||
Revision as of 01:30, 11 January 2013
Verse
What if the stories were true? What if there really were Vampires and Werewolves and Wizards and Witches who really could turn you into a toad, or make you think they had? Suppose Nick and Nora Charles were the most powerful couple in the country...
There is a story that the world is a disc borne on the backs of four elephants which stand on the carapace of an enormous turtle. In one corner of the Multiverse (the one farthest from Reality) this, too, is true. This is where the story creates the history and a one-in-a-million chance turns up nine times out of ten and the ocean falls into space around the rim without depleting itself. On the Discworld, "what if?" must be answered, the stories lived, the myth made real.
Tales from this remote universe arrive regularly via inspiration particles intercepting the particularly receptive and talented brain of Sir Terry Pratchett, OBE. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to sort, file and illuminate the elements of these chronicles in this little corner of the vast library of L-space. Just don't forget your ball of string.
Bridge
Terry Pratchett and Charles Dodgson
I've been fascinated for years by The Author's stated dislike of Alice in Wonderland. As a new reader myself, all those generations ago, I was very fond of it (despite being a male child), along with Treasure Island and Tom Sawyer. These are the books I recall as demonstrating the joy of reading to the formative mind. Here we are, decades later, author and dedicated fan in major disagreement.
The kicker is that the two writers employ similar devices, lampooning the humdrum real world from a fantastic remote location. Mr Pratchett, in the usual quote (see Howandaland), descends to a rather Republican level of pooh-pooh name-calling without a very convincing argument: it just rubs him the wrong way. I wonder why.
Chorus
I sometimes sit and laugh giddily at the mere existence of some Pratchett characters (Carrot Ironfoundersson, say) and the reality he creates out of the absurd stereotype. This is often toward the end of the bottle of wine, but still, it suggests how he's different from other writers I have followed. There are now more than a thousand Discworld characters described here, and that's not all.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Made a sysop for the many good contributions --Sanity 01:34, 19 August 2006 (CEST)