Talk:Arena: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (1 revision: Talk Namespace) |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:We've had the same discusion at the german discwiki. Perhaps this could be helpfull: [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.books.pratchett/msg/a9bcf9ac401f33e3?dmode=source]. --[[User:Rene|Rene]] 08:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC) | :We've had the same discusion at the german discwiki. Perhaps this could be helpfull: [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.books.pratchett/msg/a9bcf9ac401f33e3?dmode=source]. --[[User:Rene|Rene]] 08:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
[[User:Rene|Rene]] points out a doubt in The Creator's own mind. Why not: the Patrician was a minor failure to storyboard every detail dozens of books into the future? | |||
I suspect most of us separate the first two books from the rest of the canon as a formative period when an astonishing amount of ''scenario'' was established, but some elements were vetoed by [[Narrativia]] and had to be improved. There was the early sci-fi and then {{COM}} and {{TLF}} and then there was a realised Discworld. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 02:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:34, 27 April 2014
Few believe in the single-Patrician hypothesis, but the COM Patrician sounds too sharp to be Snapcase, either. There may have been a few in between; who knows? --Old Dickens 21:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
- We've had the same discusion at the german discwiki. Perhaps this could be helpfull: [1]. --Rene 08:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Rene points out a doubt in The Creator's own mind. Why not: the Patrician was a minor failure to storyboard every detail dozens of books into the future?
I suspect most of us separate the first two books from the rest of the canon as a formative period when an astonishing amount of scenario was established, but some elements were vetoed by Narrativia and had to be improved. There was the early sci-fi and then The Colour of Magic and The Light Fantastic and then there was a realised Discworld. --Old Dickens (talk) 02:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)