Talk:Webcomic and Graphic Novel Suggestions

I'd put it in Reading suggestions with the rest. --Old Dickens (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

Integral or as a sub-category? I'll backtrack and reorganise later - bed beckons right now. And i'm still only up to page 240 - want to make the pleasure last and am rationing myself! AgProv (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

It seems to be a page, like Reading suggestions, why its own category? --Old Dickens (talk) 01:55, 15 November 2013 (GMT)

Suggest these courses of action A. Changed to a sub-category of reading suggestions (as previous users have proposed) and removed from main page B. Content to be merged into the reading suggestions page and removed from main page Reasons: 1. Lack of content, why have an own category when there is a "reading suggestion" category 2. Lack of relevance to Terry Pratchett and the Discworld (And therefore perhaps not the best to have on the main page) 3. Misappropriate number of page views (Being 10,849 times accessed this "page" has more views than E.G.: Lecturer in Recent Runes. page), more than it deserves which in my opinion because of it's placement in the main page --[--Heimar (talk) 07:24:13, 10 January 2017 (GMT)

Much as I said above: three years is getting to be a long time for AgProv to "backtrack and reorganise". I wouldn't merge it, though, Reading suggestions is long enough; I'd just link to this page. It's already categorised in Reading suggestions; a single page doesn't need a subcategory either. --Old Dickens (talk) 17:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

That would actually be the better solution, as it actually is a "reading suggestion" --Heimar (talk) 23:01:10, 10 January 2017 (GMT)

The "Oglaf" wp link is pretty psychedelic: yields a page that doesn't mention "Oglaf". --Old Dickens (talk) 04:43, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Ah, something I started then neglected. Better get the thinking liquid out, pour a glass, consider constructive criticism expressed here, and have a think. AgProv (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)