Talk:Anthropomorphic personification: Difference between revisions
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) (more editing needed) |
m (1 revision: Talk Namespace) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 03:15, 26 December 2012
Why are Auditors AnthPers? I don't think they have a shape, let alone anthropoid (they "wear" monk-like robes to give themselves some physical form,) nor do they represent an abstract concept (unless you allow bureaucracy.) - Also, considering who has his finger on the power switch here, what about the anthropomorphic personification of mental health?--Old Dickens 19:49, 20 February 2007 (CET)
- How else should they be classified? I agree that they do not meet the definition of a personification. Fhh98 00:44, 22 February 2007 (CET)
I think they're most like demons, who aren't categorised either, nor Gaiman-style angels. Maybe "Death's Domain and supernatural entities" should be split into APs, gods, and in-betweens like those?--Old Dickens 01:19, 22 February 2007 (CET)
Should this page be a category, a subcategory of Category:Supernatural entities? Kellyterryjones 20:40, 22 December 2007 (CET)
Blather
This still has a couple of hundred wasted words; hard to stay awake. --Old Dickens 14:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)