Template talk:Spoilersfor: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not keen on this template altogether. To avoid spoilers, don't look in the Pratchett wiki, some articles include whole plots. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 04:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC) | I'm not keen on this template altogether. To avoid spoilers, don't look in the Pratchett wiki, some articles include whole plots. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 04:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
:Well, that's fair. I'd say then that we should just remove it, and add a spoiler warning to the front page, just so people have that expectation. — [[User:Guybrush|Guybrush]] ([[User talk:Guybrush|talk]]) 04:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC) | :Well, that's fair. I'd say then that we should just remove it, and add a spoiler warning to the front page, just so people have that expectation. — [[User:Guybrush|Guybrush]] ([[User talk:Guybrush|talk]]) 04:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
Perhaps Osiris put the comment marks in with the same sentiment. [[User:Sanity|Sanity]] wrote a header back in the day to the effect that articles "may contain nuts and spoilers to books". --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 04:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC) | Perhaps Osiris put the comment marks in with the same sentiment. [[User:Sanity|Sanity]] wrote a header back in the day to the effect that articles "may contain nuts and spoilers to books". --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 04:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)<BR> | ||
I just noticed that [[Krull]] starts with the template. There aren't many. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 22:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:10, 4 February 2025
I'm not keen on this template altogether. To avoid spoilers, don't look in the Pratchett wiki, some articles include whole plots. --Old Dickens (talk) 04:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well, that's fair. I'd say then that we should just remove it, and add a spoiler warning to the front page, just so people have that expectation. — Guybrush (talk) 04:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Perhaps Osiris put the comment marks in with the same sentiment. Sanity wrote a header back in the day to the effect that articles "may contain nuts and spoilers to books". --Old Dickens (talk) 04:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
I just noticed that Krull starts with the template. There aren't many. --Old Dickens (talk) 22:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)