Template talk:Spoilersfor: Difference between revisions

From Discworld & Terry Pratchett Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm not keen on this template altogether. To avoid spoilers, don't look in the Pratchett wiki, some articles include whole plots. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 04:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm not keen on this template altogether. To avoid spoilers, don't look in the Pratchett wiki, some articles include whole plots. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 04:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
:Well, that's fair. I'd say then that we should just remove it, and add a spoiler warning to the front page, just so people have that expectation. — [[User:Guybrush|Guybrush]] ([[User talk:Guybrush|talk]]) 04:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
:Well, that's fair. I'd say then that we should just remove it, and add a spoiler warning to the front page, just so people have that expectation. — [[User:Guybrush|Guybrush]] ([[User talk:Guybrush|talk]]) 04:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Perhaps Osiris put the comment marks in with the same sentiment. [[User:Sanity|Sanity]] wrote a header back in the day to the effect that articles "may contain nuts and spoilers to books". --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 04:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:10, 30 January 2025

I'm not keen on this template altogether. To avoid spoilers, don't look in the Pratchett wiki, some articles include whole plots. --Old Dickens (talk) 04:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, that's fair. I'd say then that we should just remove it, and add a spoiler warning to the front page, just so people have that expectation. — Guybrush (talk) 04:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Perhaps Osiris put the comment marks in with the same sentiment. Sanity wrote a header back in the day to the effect that articles "may contain nuts and spoilers to books". --Old Dickens (talk) 04:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)