Talk:Woddeley's Occult Primer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) (deletion) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I've just taken a look at the Discworld MUD and the best I can offer is that this is a spoiler. I suspect it is not sanctioned, as one of the rules is that no spoilers are to be made public. --[[User:Lias Bluestone|Lias Bluestone]] ([[User talk:Lias Bluestone|talk]]) 19:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC) | :I've just taken a look at the Discworld MUD and the best I can offer is that this is a spoiler. I suspect it is not sanctioned, as one of the rules is that no spoilers are to be made public. --[[User:Lias Bluestone|Lias Bluestone]] ([[User talk:Lias Bluestone|talk]]) 19:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
Not finding any support or defense, I've removed it. The previous sentence is also speculative but not so tedious. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 04:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:49, 28 July 2018
Hmmm. The recent edit contains no spam and it's too relevant to be called vandalism but it's certainly unsightly and unnecessary. We don't usually reproduce whole publications, even with permission. (L-Space main site, maybe.) I'll wait for some defense or other opinion. --Old Dickens (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- I've just taken a look at the Discworld MUD and the best I can offer is that this is a spoiler. I suspect it is not sanctioned, as one of the rules is that no spoilers are to be made public. --Lias Bluestone (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Not finding any support or defense, I've removed it. The previous sentence is also speculative but not so tedious. --Old Dickens (talk) 04:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)