User talk:Jagra: Difference between revisions
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) (not grammer) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== == | == == | ||
Good job on the categories...(looks for thumb-up emoticon: not a sausage)! --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 03:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC) | Good job on the categories...(looks for thumb-up emoticon: not a sausage)! --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 03:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
==Olde English Spelynge== | |||
Um, that's not gramm'''a'''r, it's spelling, and there's nothing wrong with "program". --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 17:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:23, 31 July 2016
Erm...yes. One might wish you were more obsessed with filing and organisation. I doubt that many of us have thought of role-playing games as books, or songs as short stories (see other examples of games and songs). It rather defeats the purpose of categories and namespaces. Please look around and try to get a feel for what goes where. --Old Dickens (talk) 22:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
I moved the anthem back, however the Gurps books are just that, no board, no pieces. If you disagree with me, fine, but try asking me next time. --Jagra 15:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Good job on the categories...(looks for thumb-up emoticon: not a sausage)! --Old Dickens (talk) 03:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Olde English Spelynge
Um, that's not grammar, it's spelling, and there's nothing wrong with "program". --Old Dickens (talk) 17:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)