Category talk:Streets of Ankh-Morpork: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Useful idea, or just too fiddly to bother with? [[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 16:18, 10 December 2012 (PST) | Useful idea, or just too fiddly to bother with? [[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 16:18, 10 December 2012 (PST) | ||
:Useful idea but just too difficult to impose. Hells, we don't even have the old Help:Editing at the moment and few ever paid attention to it. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (PST) | :Useful idea but just too difficult to impose. Hells, we don't even have the old Help:Editing at the moment and few ever paid attention to it. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (PST) | ||
::Maybe we could split the streets category into two smaller categories, one for main streets and one for side/smaller streets. --[[User:Zdm|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm|talk]]) 17:30, 10 December 2012 (PST) | |||
:Naaa...if a street doesn't figure in the canon it doesn't need an article. Mention it in an adjacent article, with AgProv's co-ordinates: some keen type might do a list page with links where justified and grid numbers otherwise. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 18:03, 10 December 2012 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 02:03, 11 December 2012
A proposed Wiki convention
As a suggestion for dealing with the banquet of riches presented by the revised city map and the The Compleat Ankh-Morpork in general, could I suggest the following? If a street is mentioned but too minor to merit an entry all of its own, the appropriate map co-ordinate number could be given in the entry where the street is mentioned, ie in the form Dismass Row(B5).
Useful idea, or just too fiddly to bother with? AgProv (talk) 16:18, 10 December 2012 (PST)
- Useful idea but just too difficult to impose. Hells, we don't even have the old Help:Editing at the moment and few ever paid attention to it. --Old Dickens (talk) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (PST)
- Naaa...if a street doesn't figure in the canon it doesn't need an article. Mention it in an adjacent article, with AgProv's co-ordinates: some keen type might do a list page with links where justified and grid numbers otherwise. --Old Dickens (talk) 18:03, 10 December 2012 (PST)