Talk:Procrastinator: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) (Roundworld parallel) |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) (remove dead link) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:That's what it says in [[Qu]], and I agree --[[User:Iron Hippo|Iron Hippo]] 19:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | :That's what it says in [[Qu]], and I agree --[[User:Iron Hippo|Iron Hippo]] 19:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
== | ==Engineering== | ||
I've usually seen illustrated and assumed that the procrastinators spun on a vertical axis. This seems intuitive and puts most of the stress on the bottom bearing which can be buttered quickly by the attendant. {{NW}}, however, mentions the set Lu-Tze uses in Ankh-Morpork which "look like your grannie's mangle". "Backpack" personal models would need to work in any orientation, so it's the old problem of priorities. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 01:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:38, 10 February 2022
I read Qu as a pun on the character of Q in the James Bond stories who supplies the hero with all sorts of technologically bizarre weapons.
- That's what it says in Qu, and I agree --Iron Hippo 19:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Engineering
I've usually seen illustrated and assumed that the procrastinators spun on a vertical axis. This seems intuitive and puts most of the stress on the bottom bearing which can be buttered quickly by the attendant. Night Watch, however, mentions the set Lu-Tze uses in Ankh-Morpork which "look like your grannie's mangle". "Backpack" personal models would need to work in any orientation, so it's the old problem of priorities. --Old Dickens (talk) 01:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)