Talk:Ermintrude Fanshaw: Difference between revisions
AnnieBudgie (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
AnnieBudgie (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Henry's (and Ermintude's) numbers in the order of succession have been batted around here and elsewhere as if by Journalists! It's like this, folks. The book states (pp.69, 379) that 138 people have to die for Henry to become King. The first of these would be the King himself, number 0. Henry, then, is 138th in succession, and Ermintrude is 139th. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 22:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | Henry's (and Ermintude's) numbers in the order of succession have been batted around here and elsewhere as if by Journalists! It's like this, folks. The book states (pp.69, 379) that 138 people have to die for Henry to become King. The first of these would be the King himself, number 0. Henry, then, is 138th in succession, and Ermintrude is 139th. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 22:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
==Queen Ermintrude?== | ==Queen Ermintrude?== | ||
One wonders what name she assumed as Queen. Surely not Ermintrude nor Daphne? --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 02:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC) | One wonders what name she assumed as Queen. Surely not Ermintrude nor Daphne? --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 02:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
Um, I'm pretty sure in the book it mentions she gets married...should this be mentioned in there? --[[User:AnnieBudgie|AnnieBudgie]] 16 July 2016 | |||
:It wouldn't hurt, but I think all we know about the Prince Consort is that he was Danish. Of course, with her children being mentioned, it would have been pretty exciting if she weren't married. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 14:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
Right, I might add that in next time I read the book if no-one else does it. --[[User:AnnieBudgie|AnnieBudgie]] 17 July 2016 | |||
Latest revision as of 06:09, 17 July 2016
Henry's (and Ermintude's) numbers in the order of succession have been batted around here and elsewhere as if by Journalists! It's like this, folks. The book states (pp.69, 379) that 138 people have to die for Henry to become King. The first of these would be the King himself, number 0. Henry, then, is 138th in succession, and Ermintrude is 139th. --Old Dickens 22:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
you mean the queen it would be queen Victoria in the mid 19th century she would be 0
did Ermintrude (Daphn) ever become queen wee know here father did but did she (unsigned comment by 86.162.133.23 4 Dec 2009}
- Yes, sh didde. --Old Dickens 22:13, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I know I wrote that before finishing the book but you can’t blame me it’s not written down on her page (now it is)
- Please, whoever it is who are posting from 86.162.133.23, as a reader and fan of the works by Terry Pratchett you are most welcome to this wiki. However please read the guides to posting, please sign all of your contributions (there is a button on top of the edit-box) and if you are going to post regularly please register. Sysop --Iron Hippo 21:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Also; please don't hesitate to ask questions at Discworld & Pratchett Wiki:Mended Drum, noobs are allowed to ask stoopid questions, old hands are not allowed to take the mickey, much ---Iron Hippo 00:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh, come on...I could hardly restrain myself there, could I? --Old Dickens 02:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Queen Ermintrude?
One wonders what name she assumed as Queen. Surely not Ermintrude nor Daphne? --Old Dickens (talk) 02:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Um, I'm pretty sure in the book it mentions she gets married...should this be mentioned in there? --AnnieBudgie 16 July 2016
- It wouldn't hurt, but I think all we know about the Prince Consort is that he was Danish. Of course, with her children being mentioned, it would have been pretty exciting if she weren't married. --Old Dickens (talk) 14:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Right, I might add that in next time I read the book if no-one else does it. --AnnieBudgie 17 July 2016