File talk:Troll woman sleeping.jpg: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) (um...no) |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not apparent to me; I'd say highly contrived. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 18:21, 26 December 2012 (PST) | Not apparent to me; I'd say highly contrived. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 18:21, 26 December 2012 (PST) | ||
A good job I didn't post it to an article then... now you come to mention it, I can see signs of photomanipulation.. that face looks too good to be true, in retrospect. Ah well, just because it was billed as a genuine photograph does not mean I should suspend cynical disbelief... still an interesting piece of artwork in its own right, I think....[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 18:50, 26 December 2012 (PST) | |||
:Yes, quite nice as a piece of art; I wonder if it was even intended as a hoax. She's rather slim and sexy for a Troll... --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 18:59, 26 December 2012 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:59, 27 December 2012
Not apparent to me; I'd say highly contrived. --Old Dickens (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2012 (PST)
A good job I didn't post it to an article then... now you come to mention it, I can see signs of photomanipulation.. that face looks too good to be true, in retrospect. Ah well, just because it was billed as a genuine photograph does not mean I should suspend cynical disbelief... still an interesting piece of artwork in its own right, I think....AgProv (talk) 18:50, 26 December 2012 (PST)
- Yes, quite nice as a piece of art; I wonder if it was even intended as a hoax. She's rather slim and sexy for a Troll... --Old Dickens (talk) 18:59, 26 December 2012 (PST)
