Talk:Book:Men at Arms: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) (suggestions) |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) (Joshing) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The recent edits create a lot of red links that are likely to stay red, and while I don't remember the reference, I'll bet Thighbiter's book title contains a "long s" (ſ), not an "f". --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 21:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | The recent edits create a lot of red links that are likely to stay red, and while I don't remember the reference, I'll bet Thighbiter's book title contains a "long s" (ſ), not an "f". --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 21:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I think it is supposed to be a "long s". Should it just be an "s", then? | |||
:And yeah, a lot of the links are likely to stay red for a while (or forever), but I'm making them links so as to make it easier to create the article linked to (if one would be created). And if said character/location/thing doesn't deserve an article, then the link can be removed in the future... anyway, a lot of other books have similar red links- {{COM}} used to have a lot, but I've created a lot of articles where there is appropriate information. [[User:TC01|TC01]] 21:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
I guess you have to correct the spelling for a link or title. No one is likely to search under the Morporkian (mis)spelling. Again, I wonder if there's anything to be said about it to justify the link at all. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 22:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
:If anything definitely doesn't seem to justify a link, I'll remove it- I already removed a lot of the links to kings and architects (who we know nothing about), and to the book you mentioned and some other concepts. [[User:TC01|TC01]] 19:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
The File:Cover Men At Arms.jpg wants a [[File talk:Cover Men At Arms.jpg|discussion of its own.]] If that's Fred on our right, who's that just behind and attached to Nobby? --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 04:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:46, 26 March 2023
The recent edits create a lot of red links that are likely to stay red, and while I don't remember the reference, I'll bet Thighbiter's book title contains a "long s" (ſ), not an "f". --Old Dickens 21:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- I think it is supposed to be a "long s". Should it just be an "s", then?
- And yeah, a lot of the links are likely to stay red for a while (or forever), but I'm making them links so as to make it easier to create the article linked to (if one would be created). And if said character/location/thing doesn't deserve an article, then the link can be removed in the future... anyway, a lot of other books have similar red links- The Colour of Magic used to have a lot, but I've created a lot of articles where there is appropriate information. TC01 21:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
I guess you have to correct the spelling for a link or title. No one is likely to search under the Morporkian (mis)spelling. Again, I wonder if there's anything to be said about it to justify the link at all. --Old Dickens 22:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- If anything definitely doesn't seem to justify a link, I'll remove it- I already removed a lot of the links to kings and architects (who we know nothing about), and to the book you mentioned and some other concepts. TC01 19:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
The File:Cover Men At Arms.jpg wants a discussion of its own. If that's Fred on our right, who's that just behind and attached to Nobby? --Old Dickens (talk) 04:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
