Talk:Small Gods: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (1 revision: Talk Namespace) |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There's an interesting reference somewhere to the idea that [[St. Ungulant]] is thought of as the "patron saint" of Small Gods, but I've not been able to track it down anywhere in the text of {{SG}} or elsewhere. Any brilliant minds out there who could pinpoint this? [[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 21:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
:It sounds like someone's inference from S.T. not really being a saint but being out there surrounded by millions of Small Gods who would prefer that he believed in them rather than his own hallucinations. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 21:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Thought so. Which is why I posted the idea here. Interesting assertion, though, and very plausible...[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 22:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Incidentally, this page had no text on it whatever but has still been accessed 399 times... searching bots looking for a loophole to exploit?[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 21:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:54, 1 April 2015
There's an interesting reference somewhere to the idea that St. Ungulant is thought of as the "patron saint" of Small Gods, but I've not been able to track it down anywhere in the text of Small Gods or elsewhere. Any brilliant minds out there who could pinpoint this? AgProv (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- It sounds like someone's inference from S.T. not really being a saint but being out there surrounded by millions of Small Gods who would prefer that he believed in them rather than his own hallucinations. --Old Dickens (talk) 21:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Thought so. Which is why I posted the idea here. Interesting assertion, though, and very plausible...AgProv (talk) 22:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Incidentally, this page had no text on it whatever but has still been accessed 399 times... searching bots looking for a loophole to exploit?AgProv (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)