Talk:Sorca: Difference between revisions
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Old Dickens (talk | contribs) (spilleng mattres) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/155.136.80.78|155.136.80.78]] 15:39, 14 December 2010 (CET) | [[Special:Contributions/155.136.80.78|155.136.80.78]] 15:39, 14 December 2010 (CET) | ||
:See also {{COM}}, "Mentioned". --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 16:35, 14 December 2010 (CET) | :See also {{COM}}, "Mentioned". --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 16:35, 14 December 2010 (CET) | ||
:Dyslexic articles on obscure subjects are difficult: apparently "'''Sorca'''" is correct. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens|talk]]) 16:45, 29 September 2013 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:45, 29 September 2013
155.136.80.88 - I don't doubt you and I'm sure if you've entered it here, it's canonical.
But I like to think I've got a pretty good grasp of the Pratchett canon, and I don't think I've heard of the Sorca people before? But I'm not claiming to know everything, and I'm sure there are lots of litle details like this that have slipped my radar. Could you possibly quote the book an the reference for this detail, just so I know where it comes from? Thanks for the contribution, and please could you also find time to convert your number to a user-name, when you're ready?
Thanks! --AgProv 14:06, 14 December 2010 (CET)
Stop Press - unless you've already done this and reurned as Homecare4, of course!--AgProv 14:08, 14 December 2010 (CET)
very early stuff The Colour of Magic page 198 in my paperback 155.136.80.78 15:39, 14 December 2010 (CET)
- See also The Colour of Magic, "Mentioned". --Old Dickens 16:35, 14 December 2010 (CET)
- Dyslexic articles on obscure subjects are difficult: apparently "Sorca" is correct. --Old Dickens (talk) 16:45, 29 September 2013 (GMT)