Talk:Stinky - Revision history

Moishe Rosenbaum: I think it's not a stub, but now I've read this talk page...

2025-02-18T01:55:50Z

I *think* it's not a stub, but now I've read this talk page...

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 18 February 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::How's that? --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)		::How's that? --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
	:Fine by me. It seems to need the ''Stub'' until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)		:Fine by me. It seems to need the ''Stub'' until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
			::Ah. Just saw this talk page comment. I agree there's supernatural thingies involved here; I don't see explanations in the canon. I guess I'd still call this a reasonable article for a minor character, at least reasonable enough not to call it a stub. But I will not argue, complain, or even send a meaningful Glance in the direction of anyone who puts the stub tag back in! :-) [[User:Moishe Rosenbaum\|Moishe Rosenbaum]] ([[User talk:Moishe Rosenbaum\|talk]]) 01:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Old Dickens at 16:08, 29 June 2018

2018-06-29T16:08:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 29 June 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:That's pretty much what I was wondering. I haven't worked up to replacing the deletions yet; feel free yourself, of course. What's left of the article may be improved, but useful bits have just been trashed. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)		:That's pretty much what I was wondering. I haven't worked up to replacing the deletions yet; feel free yourself, of course. What's left of the article may be improved, but useful bits have just been trashed. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
	::How's that? --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)		::How's that? --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
			:Fine by me. It seems to need the ''Stub'' until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Prime.mover at 06:08, 29 June 2018

2018-06-29T06:08:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:08, 29 June 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that has been violated by the original? Just curious, in case I feel the need to contribute more comprehensively. --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)		I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that has been violated by the original? Just curious, in case I feel the need to contribute more comprehensively. --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
	:That's pretty much what I was wondering. I haven't worked up to replacing the deletions yet; feel free yourself, of course. What's left of the article may be improved, but useful bits have just been trashed. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)		:That's pretty much what I was wondering. I haven't worked up to replacing the deletions yet; feel free yourself, of course. What's left of the article may be improved, but useful bits have just been trashed. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
			::How's that? --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Old Dickens at 16:30, 25 June 2018

2018-06-25T16:30:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 25 June 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that has been violated by the original? Just curious, in case I feel the need to contribute more comprehensively. --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)		I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that has been violated by the original? Just curious, in case I feel the need to contribute more comprehensively. --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
			:That's pretty much what I was wondering. I haven't worked up to replacing the deletions yet; feel free yourself, of course. What's left of the article may be improved, but useful bits have just been trashed. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Prime.mover: Created page with "I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that h..."

2018-06-25T08:48:07Z

Created page with "I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that h..."

New page

I'm curious: how come a paragraph of informatory material has been completely replaced by another? What was actually wrong with the original? Is there a house rule here that has been violated by the original? Just curious, in case I feel the need to contribute more comprehensively. --[[User:Prime.mover|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover|talk]]) 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 18 February 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::How's that? --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)		::How's that? --[[User:Prime.mover\|that's wot I '''sed''' ...]] ([[User talk:Prime.mover\|talk]]) 06:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
	:Fine by me. It seems to need the ''Stub'' until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)		:Fine by me. It seems to need the ''Stub'' until someone can come up with a coherent explanation for his supernatural quality. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 16:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
			::Ah. Just saw this talk page comment. I agree there's supernatural thingies involved here; I don't see explanations in the canon. I guess I'd still call this a reasonable article for a minor character, at least reasonable enough not to call it a stub. But I will not argue, complain, or even send a meaningful Glance in the direction of anyone who puts the stub tag back in! :-) [[User:Moishe Rosenbaum\|Moishe Rosenbaum]] ([[User talk:Moishe Rosenbaum\|talk]]) 01:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC)