Talk:Mr Hong - Revision history

Old Dickens at 15:35, 19 October 2013

2013-10-19T15:35:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 19 October 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	It's a rotten shame we couldn't save the history. When I wrote Three Jolly Luck I didn't think Mr Hong needed a separate article since that was all we knew about him. Someone (lost in the history) just copied a chunk of the original over here; I think the mentioned rewrite was done sometime since 2009. How does putting more of it in here differentiate them? --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 15:01, 19 October 2013 (GMT)		It's a rotten shame we couldn't save the history. When I wrote Three Jolly Luck I didn't think Mr Hong needed a separate article since that was all we knew about him. Someone (lost in the history) just copied a chunk of the original over here; I think the mentioned rewrite was done sometime since 2009. How does putting more of it in here differentiate them? --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 15:01, 19 October 2013 (GMT)
	:Yes, shame on that. My idea was also half-baked; perhaps the best would be to put all information on one of the two pages and redirect from the other... But I don't know how many links to Mr Hong exist side-by-side by links to Three Jolly Luck - and what can be done about that?--[[User:EinFritz\|EinFritz]] ([[User talk:EinFritz\|talk]]) 15:22, 19 October 2013 (GMT)		:Yes, shame on that. My idea was also half-baked; perhaps the best would be to put all information on one of the two pages and redirect from the other... But I don't know how many links to Mr Hong exist side-by-side by links to Three Jolly Luck - and what can be done about that?--[[User:EinFritz\|EinFritz]] ([[User talk:EinFritz\|talk]]) 15:22, 19 October 2013 (GMT)

			''Si non confectus, non reficiat'', I always say. It doesn't seem like much of a problem. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 15:35, 19 October 2013 (GMT)

EinFritz at 15:22, 19 October 2013

2013-10-19T15:22:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 19 October 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:

	It's a rotten shame we couldn't save the history. When I wrote Three Jolly Luck I didn't think Mr Hong needed a separate article since that was all we knew about him. Someone (lost in the history) just copied a chunk of the original over here; I think the mentioned rewrite was done sometime since 2009. How does putting more of it in here differentiate them? --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 15:01, 19 October 2013 (GMT)		It's a rotten shame we couldn't save the history. When I wrote Three Jolly Luck I didn't think Mr Hong needed a separate article since that was all we knew about him. Someone (lost in the history) just copied a chunk of the original over here; I think the mentioned rewrite was done sometime since 2009. How does putting more of it in here differentiate them? --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 15:01, 19 October 2013 (GMT)
			:Yes, shame on that. My idea was also half-baked; perhaps the best would be to put all information on one of the two pages and redirect from the other... But I don't know how many links to Mr Hong exist side-by-side by links to Three Jolly Luck - and what can be done about that?--[[User:EinFritz\|EinFritz]] ([[User talk:EinFritz\|talk]]) 15:22, 19 October 2013 (GMT)

Old Dickens at 15:01, 19 October 2013

2013-10-19T15:01:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 19 October 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A complete rewrite might be in order here, rather than just copying the section of [[Three Jolly Luck]], but creating a sentence fragment doesn't seem to help. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 21:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)		A complete rewrite might be in order here, rather than just copying the section of [[Three Jolly Luck]], but creating a sentence fragment doesn't seem to help. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 21:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
	:I've done my best, for what it's worth. But the problem remains that Mr. Hong and his fish bar appear only in unison. As far as I see it, to differentiate the articles a little, we should put all new details on the Three Jolly Luck site and all references to the books on this page.--[[User:EinFritz\|EinFritz]] ([[User talk:EinFritz\|talk]]) 14:28, 19 October 2013 (GMT)		:I've done my best, for what it's worth. But the problem remains that Mr. Hong and his fish bar appear only in unison. As far as I see it, to differentiate the articles a little, we should put all new details on the Three Jolly Luck site and all references to the books on this page.--[[User:EinFritz\|EinFritz]] ([[User talk:EinFritz\|talk]]) 14:28, 19 October 2013 (GMT)

			It's a rotten shame we couldn't save the history. When I wrote Three Jolly Luck I didn't think Mr Hong needed a separate article since that was all we knew about him. Someone (lost in the history) just copied a chunk of the original over here; I think the mentioned rewrite was done sometime since 2009. How does putting more of it in here differentiate them? --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 15:01, 19 October 2013 (GMT)

EinFritz: Mr. Hong and his fish bar are closely coupled...

2013-10-19T14:28:00Z

Mr. Hong and his fish bar are closely coupled...

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 19 October 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A complete rewrite might be in order here, rather than just copying the section of [[Three Jolly Luck]], but creating a sentence fragment doesn't seem to help. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 21:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)		A complete rewrite might be in order here, rather than just copying the section of [[Three Jolly Luck]], but creating a sentence fragment doesn't seem to help. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 21:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
			:I've done my best, for what it's worth. But the problem remains that Mr. Hong and his fish bar appear only in unison. As far as I see it, to differentiate the articles a little, we should put all new details on the Three Jolly Luck site and all references to the books on this page.--[[User:EinFritz\|EinFritz]] ([[User talk:EinFritz\|talk]]) 14:28, 19 October 2013 (GMT)

Osiris: 1 revision: Talk Namespace

2012-12-26T03:16:37Z

1 revision: Talk Namespace

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:16, 26 December 2012
(No difference)

Old Dickens: why is this better?

2009-07-09T21:44:53Z

why is this better?

New page

A complete rewrite might be in order here, rather than just copying the section of [[Three Jolly Luck]], but creating a sentence fragment doesn't seem to help. --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 21:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 19 October 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	It's a rotten shame we couldn't save the history. When I wrote Three Jolly Luck I didn't think Mr Hong needed a separate article since that was all we knew about him. Someone (lost in the history) just copied a chunk of the original over here; I think the mentioned rewrite was done sometime since 2009. How does putting more of it in here differentiate them? --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 15:01, 19 October 2013 (GMT)		It's a rotten shame we couldn't save the history. When I wrote Three Jolly Luck I didn't think Mr Hong needed a separate article since that was all we knew about him. Someone (lost in the history) just copied a chunk of the original over here; I think the mentioned rewrite was done sometime since 2009. How does putting more of it in here differentiate them? --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 15:01, 19 October 2013 (GMT)
	:Yes, shame on that. My idea was also half-baked; perhaps the best would be to put all information on one of the two pages and redirect from the other... But I don't know how many links to Mr Hong exist side-by-side by links to Three Jolly Luck - and what can be done about that?--[[User:EinFritz\|EinFritz]] ([[User talk:EinFritz\|talk]]) 15:22, 19 October 2013 (GMT)		:Yes, shame on that. My idea was also half-baked; perhaps the best would be to put all information on one of the two pages and redirect from the other... But I don't know how many links to Mr Hong exist side-by-side by links to Three Jolly Luck - and what can be done about that?--[[User:EinFritz\|EinFritz]] ([[User talk:EinFritz\|talk]]) 15:22, 19 October 2013 (GMT)

			''Si non confectus, non reficiat'', I always say. It doesn't seem like much of a problem. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 15:35, 19 October 2013 (GMT)