Talk:Guild of Conjurors - Revision history

Old Dickens: visible magic

2022-04-24T05:14:45Z

visible magic

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 24 April 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Indeed it does. Constructive criticism heard and absorbed and article suitably rewritten. Although the general operating priciples and logic of the Discworld do not seem violated by the suggestion....--[[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] 18:56, 24 August 2011 (CEST)		Indeed it does. Constructive criticism heard and absorbed and article suitably rewritten. Although the general operating priciples and logic of the Discworld do not seem violated by the suggestion....--[[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] 18:56, 24 August 2011 (CEST)

			==Prejudices==
			I've always enjoyed good conjuring, myself: Doug Henning, Harry Anderson, even local acts who could handle cards and coins and make you say "What?". I've even seen some really funny clowning (and [[demarcation]] is difficult; who's a conjuror and who's a joculator?). --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 05:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

AgProv: killing redlink

2016-07-29T08:55:54Z

killing redlink

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:55, 29 July 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	There is also a [[Conjurers' Guild]] article covering at least some of this ground. Perhaps the two could be brought together? I leave it to the Editors to decide...--[[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] 03:02, 20 May 2007 (CEST)		There is also a Conjurers' Guild article covering at least some of this ground. Perhaps the two could be brought together? I leave it to the Editors to decide...--[[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] 03:02, 20 May 2007 (CEST)

	The other seems to be lifted largely from the ''Companion'', and I would support replacing it with this, but I'd like to get some consensus on the spelling (the ''Companion'' has "Conjurers'".)...--[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 04:04, 20 May 2007 (CEST)		The other seems to be lifted largely from the ''Companion'', and I would support replacing it with this, but I'd like to get some consensus on the spelling (the ''Companion'' has "Conjurers'".)...--[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] 04:04, 20 May 2007 (CEST)

Osiris: 1 revision: Talk Namespace

2012-12-26T03:16:15Z

1 revision: Talk Namespace

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:16, 26 December 2012
(No difference)

AgProv at 16:56, 24 August 2011

2011-08-24T16:56:46Z

New page

There is also a [[Conjurers' Guild]] article covering at least some of this ground. Perhaps the two could be brought together? I leave it to the Editors to decide...--[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] 03:02, 20 May 2007 (CEST)

The other seems to be lifted largely from the ''Companion'', and I would support replacing it with this, but I'd like to get some consensus on the spelling (the ''Companion'' has "Conjurers'".)...--[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 04:04, 20 May 2007 (CEST)

Maybe it's just me, but this article seems to be drawing an awful lot out of a single mention of conjurers learning their patter by rote, and being rather unenthusiastic about it. [[User:Daibhid C|Daibhid C]] 17:58, 23 August 2011 (CEST)
:(This happens a lot.) --[[User:Old Dickens|Old Dickens]] 00:39, 24 August 2011 (CEST)

Indeed it does. Constructive criticism heard and absorbed and article suitably rewritten. Although the general operating priciples and logic of the Discworld do not seem violated by the suggestion....--[[User:AgProv|AgProv]] 18:56, 24 August 2011 (CEST)