Category talk:Streets of Ankh-Morpork - Revision history

Old Dickens at 02:03, 11 December 2012

2012-12-11T02:03:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 11 December 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Useful idea but just too difficult to impose. Hells, we don't even have the old Help:Editing at the moment and few ever paid attention to it. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (PST)		:Useful idea but just too difficult to impose. Hells, we don't even have the old Help:Editing at the moment and few ever paid attention to it. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (PST)
	::Maybe we could split the streets category into two smaller categories, one for main streets and one for side/smaller streets. --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 17:30, 10 December 2012 (PST)		::Maybe we could split the streets category into two smaller categories, one for main streets and one for side/smaller streets. --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 17:30, 10 December 2012 (PST)
			:Naaa...if a street doesn't figure in the canon it doesn't need an article. Mention it in an adjacent article, with AgProv's co-ordinates: some keen type might do a list page with links where justified and grid numbers otherwise. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 18:03, 10 December 2012 (PST)

Zdm: /* A proposed Wiki convention */

2012-12-11T01:30:30Z

A proposed Wiki convention

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 11 December 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Useful idea, or just too fiddly to bother with? [[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv\|talk]]) 16:18, 10 December 2012 (PST)		Useful idea, or just too fiddly to bother with? [[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv\|talk]]) 16:18, 10 December 2012 (PST)
	:Useful idea but just too difficult to impose. Hells, we don't even have the old Help:Editing at the moment and few ever paid attention to it. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (PST)		:Useful idea but just too difficult to impose. Hells, we don't even have the old Help:Editing at the moment and few ever paid attention to it. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (PST)
			::Maybe we could split the streets category into two smaller categories, one for main streets and one for side/smaller streets. --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 17:30, 10 December 2012 (PST)

Old Dickens at 01:15, 11 December 2012

2012-12-11T01:15:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 11 December 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Useful idea, or just too fiddly to bother with? [[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv\|talk]]) 16:18, 10 December 2012 (PST)		Useful idea, or just too fiddly to bother with? [[User:AgProv\|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv\|talk]]) 16:18, 10 December 2012 (PST)
			:Useful idea but just too difficult to impose. Hells, we don't even have the old Help:Editing at the moment and few ever paid attention to it. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (PST)

AgProv: Created page with "==A proposed Wiki convention== As a suggestion for dealing with the banquet of riches presented by the revised city map and the {{CAM}} in general, could I suggest the follow..."

2012-12-11T00:18:24Z

Created page with "==A proposed Wiki convention== As a suggestion for dealing with the banquet of riches presented by the revised city map and the {{CAM}} in general, could I suggest the follow..."

New page

==A proposed Wiki convention==

As a suggestion for dealing with the banquet of riches presented by the revised city map and the {{CAM}} in general, could I suggest the following? If a street is mentioned but too minor to merit an entry all of its own, the appropriate map co-ordinate number could be given in the entry where the street is mentioned, ie in the form ''Dismass Row(B5)''.

Useful idea, or just too fiddly to bother with? [[User:AgProv|AgProv]] ([[User talk:AgProv|talk]]) 16:18, 10 December 2012 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 11 December 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Useful idea but just too difficult to impose. Hells, we don't even have the old Help:Editing at the moment and few ever paid attention to it. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (PST)		:Useful idea but just too difficult to impose. Hells, we don't even have the old Help:Editing at the moment and few ever paid attention to it. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (PST)
	::Maybe we could split the streets category into two smaller categories, one for main streets and one for side/smaller streets. --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 17:30, 10 December 2012 (PST)		::Maybe we could split the streets category into two smaller categories, one for main streets and one for side/smaller streets. --[[User:Zdm\|Zdm]] ([[User talk:Zdm\|talk]]) 17:30, 10 December 2012 (PST)
			:Naaa...if a street doesn't figure in the canon it doesn't need an article. Mention it in an adjacent article, with AgProv's co-ordinates: some keen type might do a list page with links where justified and grid numbers otherwise. --[[User:Old Dickens\|Old Dickens]] ([[User talk:Old Dickens\|talk]]) 18:03, 10 December 2012 (PST)